The Washington Post’s political reporter Scott Clement recently asked the question: Which of these cats and dogs can you sell for $100 or $100,000?
The answer is that there’s nothing wrong with a cat or dog for sale for $1,000 or $1 million.
However, that’s not the case with the Washington Post.
It’s the Post’s definition of “commercial animal husband and family” that is at odds with the definition of the Humane Society of the United States.
The Humane Society’s definition is as follows: Commercial animal husband, family, or domestic pet: Any mammal or bird that is capable of being trained for commercial purposes.
In the case of dogs, this includes both farm and non-farm animals.
Animals that are capable of doing work for commercial use, including domestic animals, such as dogs, cats, and horses, are exempt from this requirement.
Commercial animal owners can sell their animals for a profit, but this does not mean they are required to do so.
The Washington, D.C.-based Humane Society says it has “federal standards for determining if a dog meets these requirements.”
The Humane SPCA, which provides services to animals and helps animals that are lost or abused, says it is not a licensed animal dealer.
The Associated Press contacted the Humane SpcA and the Washington, DC-based Humane Association to see if the organization is licensed.
The AP could not reach them for comment.
It appears the Humane Association is not the same organization that regulates the Washington D..
SPC, but is the only one allowed to sell animals for profit.
The Animal Welfare Institute, an advocacy group that supports animal welfare, says the Washington Humane Society does not have to comply with federal standards, but that the AP is using the wrong definition.
“The Animal Welfare institute has stated that any animals in a sale should be registered and the Humane society’s definition would apply,” said spokeswoman Julie Stegall.
“In this case, the Washington SPC and the AP are using the same definition of ‘commercial animal.’
The AP is incorrect about how the Humane organization operates.”
The AP’s article about the sale of the pet was published Sunday and has been shared more than 600 times.
The Post’s article is now available on YouTube.
It describes the animal as a “panda” and asks: Does this sound like a good way to make money?
It goes on to describe the sale as a sale of a “cat and dog,” and then adds that “the animal is now owned by the Humane Sanctuary of the District of Columbia.”
The Washington Spc also has a “buy” button on its website.
The animal is listed as “sold” and “purchased.”
The website is not registered as a pet dealer under federal law, but it does have a link to the AP article.
The website also includes a photo of the animal and a statement from the Washington City SPC.
“We appreciate your interest in the story.
The SPC is an accredited pet dealer and does not sell animals in its care,” it says.
The story has been retweeted more than 3,300 times.